Poster Presentation 11th Australian Peptide Conference 2015

A comparative study of heating methods used for automated SPPS of difficult sequences (#147)

Daniel Martínez 1 , Elizabeth Restituyo-Rosario 1 , James P P Cain 1 , Katya Karankevich 1 , Nate Cosper 1
  1. Protein Technologies, Inc., Tucson, ARIZONA, United States

Recent technological advances in rapid heating have improved process development and synthesis optimization methods for “difficult” peptides, or peptides that exhibit secondary structure formation, have adjacent beta-branched residues or adjacent sterically-hindered residues, and/or intra/intermolecular aggregation. Electromagnetic irradiation such as microwave (MW) and infrared (IR) heating provide non-contact heating of absorbing materials more rapidly than conventional heating methods. Adjacent on the electromagnetic spectrum, IR heating has been shown to have a faster time to temperature than MW and also provides the potential for scale-up.

Using the Symphony X and Tribute UV-IR with IR heating, a number of difficult peptides have been synthesized with crude purities equivalent or showing improved results over MW platforms. In some cases, highly pure peptides (crude purity > 90%) can be produced using deprotection times of just one minute and coupling times of just two minutes.

A new heating technology, induction heating, has been introduced on the Prelude X. Induction heating allows for independent, simultaneous and rapid heating of multiple reactors with increased efficiency. A comparison of results for the synthesis of a number of difficult peptides using induction, infrared, and microwave heating methods is presented.